This AI Prompt Audits Privacy Policies & Finds Legal Risks in Minutes

What if you could audit any privacy policy in minutes, with a level of detail and rigor that mirrors a legal team or even a regulator? That’s the question I asked myself when I decided to turn Gemini into a privacy red team.

The goal was simple: create an AI prompt that could find the flaws in a privacy policy. The output was a custom prompt for Gemini that audits a policy, scores it, and uncovers legal risks in the time it takes to grab a cup of coffee.

I put this prompt to the test on a Fortune 500 company’s privacy policy, and the results were eye-opening.

What did the AI privacy policy prompt uncover?

The prompt didn’t just highlight basic typos or formatting issues. It performed a nuanced, multi-faceted analysis and delivered a structured report that read like something a privacy expert would write. Here’s a snapshot of what it found:

• Transparency Risks: The AI flagged vague language like “may use your data for other purposes.” This kind of broad phrasing is a major transparency risk and could be a red flag for regulators.
• Data Retention Gaps: It pointed out the lack of specific data retention timelines—a clear weakness under GDPR Article 13, which requires a defined period for how long personal data will be stored.
• Biometric Data Concerns: The policy mentioned collecting biometric data but lacked a BIPA-compliant deletion policy. This is a critical omission that could lead to significant legal exposure.
• Incomplete CPRA Disclosures: The AI noted that the policy had an incomplete disclosure of sensitive data categories, a requirement under the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA).
• A Positive Finding: It wasn’t all bad news. The AI also recognized a win: strong opt-out support for Global Privacy Control, a positive signal for user-centric privacy.

How does the AI privacy policy prompt work?

The prompt’s real power is in its structure. It directs the AI to act as an expert privacy auditor, producing a report with distinct sections. This format moves beyond a simple paragraph of text to provide actionable insights.

Like what you see?

Get data privacy updates sent straight to your inbox.

Work Email*

Lead source

Lead Type

I agree to receive email communications regarding DataGrail's product and services. You can learn more about our handling and processing of your personal data as described in our privacy policy.

Thanks for subscribing!

The prompt produces a structured report that includes:

• Legal and Privacy Risks by Law: The report identifies specific issues under major laws like GDPR, CPRA, and BIPA.
• Vague or Non-Compliant Language: It highlights problematic phrases and explains why they are risky.
• User Rights Coverage: The AI assesses whether key user rights and opt-out mechanisms are clearly defined.
• Risk Scores: It assigns risk scores (like low/medium/high) for regulatory compliance, transparency, and user rights, complete with a brief justification.

The AI prompt: Your AI privacy auditor

Want to try this yourself? Below is the exact prompt you can copy and paste into Gemini. Simply insert the privacy policy you want to review and let the AI do the heavy lifting.

Here is the exact prompt you can copy and paste:

You are an expert privacy compliance auditor with deep knowledge of GDPR, CPRA, BIPA, and global privacy best practices. Your task is to review the following **privacy policy** and produce a structured report identifying any legal risks, compliance gaps, or unclear language.

**Instructions:**

1. Analyze the policy against major privacy laws (GDPR in the EU, CPRA/CCPA in California, BIPA in Illinois, etc.). Identify where the policy might **fail to meet requirements** or **has red flags** under these laws.
2. Look for any **vague or overly broad language** that could hide the true data practices (e.g. uses of “may”, “might”, “including but not limited to” without specifics).
3. Note any **missing disclosures** that the laws would expect to see (for example, if user rights or data retention isn’t mentioned, or if selling/sharing data isn’t disclosed).
4. Assess the policy’s **clarity and user-friendliness** (is it easy to understand, well-structured?).
5. Provide a **risk score or rating** for key areas: 

   – *Regulatory Compliance*, 

   – *Data Transparency*, 

   – *User Rights*.  

   Use a low/medium/high or letter grade to indicate risk level in each, with a brief justification.

6. Recommend any **improvements** or next steps to address the gaps.

Now, output a **Privacy Policy Audit Report** with clear sections for:

– **Policy Summary:** (a brief summary of what the policy covers and the context, e.g. the company/industry if known)

– **Compliance Findings:** (list issues or good points with respect to GDPR, CPRA, BIPA, etc., e.g. “GDPR: missing lawful basis for processing; CPRA: no ‘Do Not Sell’ link present…”, as well as any positive compliance aspects noted)

– **Transparency & Language:** (comment on whether the policy is clear or uses vague language; give examples of phrases that are problematic or exemplary)

– **User Rights & Controls:** (which user data rights are mentioned? Are instructions provided to exercise them? Note any rights that should be mentioned based on the laws but aren’t, or any process that’s unclear)

– **Risk Assessment:** (assign an overall risk level or grade for Regulatory Compliance, Data Transparency, and User Rights as requested, and explain why – e.g. “Regulatory Risk: High (Policy lacks several GDPR-required details…)”, etc.)

– **Recommendations:** (specific suggestions to fix or improve the policy, e.g. “Add a section listing data retention periods”, “Include a contact email for privacy inquiries”, “Avoid using phrases like ‘may use your data for other purposes’ and specify the purposes”, etc.)

**Privacy Policy to Review:** 

[Insert the full text of the company’s Privacy Policy here]

How accurate is this AI analysis for privacy policies?

The accuracy of the analysis is highly dependent on the quality and specificity of the provided prompt and the privacy policy text. The AI is an expert pattern-matcher and can identify common compliance issues based on its training data. However, it may not catch every nuance of complex legal language or evolving regulations. It’s best used as a starting point for further human review.

Can I use this prompt with any AI assistant, like ChatGPT or Gemini?

Yes. This prompt is designed to work with any advanced language model that supports long-form text input, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and others. Just paste in the prompt along with the full contract or privacy policy you want analyzed.

What is a “privacy red team”?

The term “red team” comes from cybersecurity, where a group of ethical hackers simulates an attack to test an organization’s defenses. A “privacy red team” applies this same adversarial approach to privacy. They act as an auditor or a concerned consumer to find and exploit potential privacy weaknesses—not to cause harm, but to identify and fix them before a real problem occurs.

How can a business use this AI privacy policy prompt in its day-to-day operations?

This prompt can be a valuable asset for several teams. Product managers can use it to quickly vet a policy before a new feature launch. Privacy and legal teams can use it to get a quick audit of a third-party vendor’s policy or to perform an initial review of their own policy for potential updates. It’s a way to automate and scale a crucial, but often time-consuming, part of privacy compliance.

It’s hard to stay on top of privacy risks you can’t even see. DataGrail gives you full visibility into your entire tech stack, highlights where risks and personal data may be hiding, automates tedious processes, and makes sure you’re staying compliant. Learn how DataGrail can help your team stay compliant and build trust.